Allergic to Steven Krivit?
He's sensitive a' and seemingly impervious - to criticism, and new transactions have shown this. It's been said that a writer who edits his own work has a fool for a publisher, and Krivit has demonstrated that.
Previously Krivit was working with the main scientists in the area. Many of them will not talk
with him any longer, because he twists the things they say, extracting whatever he can assert is wrong
and emphasizing it and presenting that, having a key exception: he's when it involves Widom-Larsen theory Mr. Kid Gloves.
I've been finding that he's reconfigured his website to allow it to be difficult to locate criticism
of W-L principle, and in new strings -- beneath the name "Critique of Widom-Larsen theory" -- I've
Recorded this. What he's granted, probably as it was published under peer review or
independently, he gift ideas with a deprecatory release. What he accuses others of is what he's, himself, doing.
As well, Krivit used to get a number of responses from major researchers in-the field, on W-L
theory; these have mainly been de-linked, and only positive comments are presented, apart from
The one that was taken, out-of context, from Krivit's correspondence with Richard Garwin, and
the speech significantly distorts the meaning. Garwin had been extremely critical, efficiently
dismissive, about W-L theory, in reality, although Krivit just estimates "I did not say it had been wrong."
So now we know very well what Krivit was doing. Taubes developed his career by writing a book on "Bad
Science." Krivit managed to parlay his reporting -- which was recognized by the New Energy
Base (writer of Infinite Energy, created by Mallove) and by the *actual*
internationally-recognized authority on chilly fusion, Edmund Storms -- into authorship and
editorial positions for some encyclopedia articles. The collaboration with Marwan is dead,
last I found them together (2010 or 2011 ACS Conference?), Marwan was looking at Krivit with obvious distaste.
Krivit can be a educated author, but not an "authority on LENR." He's no understanding
of cold fusion theory, and acknowledged that in his November talk to the ANS (I.e., he could
summarize it, but not answer questions on it). To be honest, no one knows cold fusion theory,
but Krivit pretends that he knows enough to guide W-L to the exclusion of every other theory steven krivit .
He is naive, or worse, he's attached with some result, possibly the increased consideration of
W-L concept. As a company, Lattice Energy that's offered.Steven Krivit Paid by Charles Entenmann & Widom- Larsen?


首頁