WestlundColletti746

Well despite seeing the movie, I'm remaining to wonder what the big conflict is all about.

I'd never read the book collection that if the picture is a sign of what's to come and New Line Cinema is hoping to be the next Harry Potter. I am not really sure that i wish to see part 2 or 3, when they ever get made.

I could somewhat see why the Catholic League is protesting this film, in the end its a lot to accomplish about not a really good film.

For those people who have no ideal about the picture or such a thing about it please click to this link for a much better understanding, but please be skeptical this is just a major spoiler critique also.

Now what I liked in regards to the movie, The casting of Sam Elliott as Lee Scoresby was just what the position required. When you see him in the movie, you quickly realize that he is much more that what he seems at first.

The casting of Ian McKellen while the style of Iorek Byrnison, being an armored bear. Now I had no idea what a bear could do with some serious armor security, but with the voice of Sir Ian, you believe he may defend the hero of the film.

Now I realize that this film is part 1 of a part film, nevertheless the first you ought to have already been therefore far better that what we received. I'd said earlier that I'd not read the books however but even I could tell that something just was not right nor was it making sense in the way that it was told in the film, it just seemed like way too many holes were in this film. It appears about 40-60 minutes too short.

From if you're a massive fan of the book then don't begin to see the picture at all what I could tell, the movie palace, very angry will be left by you. This looks like it would be described as a great film to allow them to see If you have young kids (ten years old and up) then.

For the parents, it will leave you frustrated. A good film can be seen by me in this film, but all we enter still another mess by the end of the day. become an animator