AvilaWoods690

Then there is the most universal of all symbols, the Swastika (pictured). At 1 time it was believed that the Buddhists carried it all more than the globe with them, but it has been located out that ages just before Buddhism it was employed among nations. In Old Babylon and in Egypt it was to be located. What does this show? All these symbols could not have been purely conventional.There have to be some explanation for them some organic association between them and the human mind. Language is not the outcome of convention it is not that individuals ever agreed to represent particular suggestions by specific words there never ever was an idea with no a corresponding word or a word without having a corresponding idea tips and words are in their nature inseparable. The symbols to represent ideas might be sound symbols or colour symbols. Deaf and dumb men and women have to believe with other than sound symbols. Every thought in the mind has a type as its counterpart. This is called in Sanskrit philosophy Nama - rupa -- name and type.

It is as impossible to produce by convention a system of symbols as it is to create a language. In the world's ritualistic symbols we have an expression of the religious thought of humanity. It is simple to say that there is no use of rituals and temples and all such paraphernalia each and every baby says that in modern day times. But it have to be effortless for all to see that those who worship inside a temple are in many respects various from these who will not worship there. As a result the association of specific temples, rituals, and other concrete forms with specific religions has a tendency to bring into the minds of the followers of those religions the thoughts for which those concrete issues stand as symbols and it is not wise to ignore rituals and symbology altogether. The study and practice of these items form naturally a component of Karma-Yoga.

To get much more data pay a visit to : bmw m5 m6